LINK and PDF Below
Gravity Refraction NASA Government Document
This is the first government document. I shared this two years ago, but here’s the government documents. I shared this at the Flat Earth International Conference in Raleigh in my presentation 2017, November, last November, that Robbie Davidson put on. I thought this was something to find this document.
NASA Technical Manual
Anybody out there watching and listening this morning, you can Google NASA document 1207. You can pull up, it’ll take you straight to nasa.gov. You can pull up the PDF. You can read this for yourself. This is free information. All right, so Stephen Anderson, Danny Faulkner, Pastor Lawson, Ken Hovine. This is what NASA says. I’m going to show you, they say far worse than what’s in this government document today.
NASA Document 1207 LINK and PDF at Bottom of Post
NASA Document 1207 Statement
The derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model. In the introduction, they flat out say right here, this report documents the derivation, which means the origin, and the definition of linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a flat, non-rotating Earth. Everybody see that? Derivation means the origin. Definition means this is how it’s defined.
NASA Document 1207 – Equations
This is how it works. So NASA Document 1207 is talking about the equations. I mean, you want to talk about the calculus and trig this thing gets into. The equations are based on these airplanes flying over a non-rotating flat Earth. Question, why would this be in any technical manual of anybody if it doesn’t exist? I mean, think about it. They claim the Coriolis effect that snipers have to calculate the spinning of the Earth, the Coriolis effect, when they’re shooting at, you know, a thousand yard shot or something. Yet they don’t have to for Mach 1, 2, 3, 4 aircraft. You don’t have to calculate this. This is just about, these planes fly over non-rotating flat Earth. Oh, well, this is what I heard. Oh, well, they’re just doing that to simplify the equations. Oh, really? I’m sorry. I didn’t know that NASA rocket scientists and MIT mathematicians couldn’t factor in 8 inches per mile squared.
NASA Document 1207 – Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model
Page 30 “Flat nonrotating earth” Last Page “Flat nonrotating earth”
